The Childhood of Maxim Gorky

For those who feel that classic Russian cinema is too often drowned in propaganda, nationalism, and obsolete contemporary politics to be appreciated on anything but a formal level, then a film such as Donskoy’s The Childhood of Maxim Gorky may come as a pleasant surprise. Ostensibly, such a film would not make a good candidate for being a timeless work of art. It is, afterall, about one of 20th Century Russia’s most famous writers, Maxim Gorky, who, himself, was a proponent of the socialist realism movement that sought to spread political ideology throughout the art of communist/socialist countries. The film is even based on Gorky’s autobiography, and exists in a time in which that socialist realist movement was in full swing.

It’s not so much that the film lacks the essential elements that made up the propaganda of socialist realism, but merely that it’s much better than most other examples at keeping the heart and soul of the film on a universal and interminably relatable level. It does this by eschewing overt politics in favor of characters and story, by eschewing biased distortion in favor of phenomenal clarity, and by eschewing dictatorial narration in favor of a slightly more distant observance. It is tremendously helped by the fact that it anchors this observance to the life of a child whom is completely ignorant of the socio-political context that surrounds him. Because his conflicts echo on a primal level—the struggle for survival, the need for love, companionship, guidance, and knowledge—it drowns out any didacticism that marred so much great art that came out of the movement.

The film barely requires a plot synopsis, as this is one instance where the title is almost sufficient to describe what the film is about. It stars Aleksei Lyarski in the title role of a young Gorky who is sent to live with his domineering, Lear-like grandfather (Mikhail Troyanovsky) and loving, imaginative grandmother (Varvara Massalitinova) when he’s abandoned by his mother. He must also contend with his selfish uncles, Yakov (Vasili Novikov) and Mikhail (Aleksandr), whom have little regard for him or for the fate of his grandfather’s failing dye business. This leaves Gorky to find friends amongst his grandfather’s workers, like the gregarious gypsy, Ivan, and the purblind Grigori. Gorky also makes friends amongst the boyhood tramps, and falls in with a mischievous gang, and even befriends a crippled boy with a menagerie of insects.

In the strictest sense, one couldn’t Children a remotely comprehensive biography of a great man, though it might be unfair to even judge it on such a level since it was made as part one of a trilogy (the other two of which are scarcely available to be seen). Yet Donskoy’s film has the mark of most great cinema in that it’s able to suggest infinitely more through its truncations and ellipses than tens-of-thousands of words could accomplish. The result is a film that’s rather impressionistic, gleaning from lengthy scene a distilled depiction of Gorky’s most important childhood memories. These impressions range from the jovial, such as the party upon his arrival, to the tragic, such as the death of his friends, to the dramatic, such as the burning of the village, to the mystical, such as his grandmother’s folk tales.

All of these pieces come together to construct one of the most vivid and lifelike films about childhood in the history of cinema—one that, despite its strong roots in a contemporary art and film movement, seem to be looking both near and far ahead to cinema’s future. In fact, it’s not difficult to see a profound similarity between two of the 30s greatest cinematic artists, Renoir and John Ford. Donskoy has Renoir’s socially impressionistic eye, and a formal elegance that is paradoxically looking down on, looking up at, and even looking straight at its subjects. Unlike Renoir, though, Donskoy is more concerned with the lower, working classes in which largely rests Ford’s domain. One could call Childhood a Russian Grapes of Wrath, or perhaps a Russian How Green Was My Valley. Donskoy also has Ford’s lyricism, though tempered with Renoir’s more detached, occasionally cynical, observation.

Donskoy also seems to be looking farther ahead to the neorealists, and the subjective camera of a film like The 400 Blows. While the film frequently betrays its studio roots, it has the same grittiness that was so important to neorealism. There are plenty of films about the poor and impoverished, but Childhood is amongst the best that are able to render the dirt and mud, the straw and wood, so palpably through images. In that it also looks back to a film like Dovzhenko’s Earth, but replaces his representational poetry with something more (excuse the pun) earthy. But young Gorky is also an easy analog to Truffaut’s Antoine Doinel in how the camera depicts events through his naïve eyes. While Donskoy certainly presents the setting of socialist realism, the fact that it’s all seen an experienced through young Gorky takes the political sting out of it.

It’s an interesting question to ponder just how much Donskoy was consciously drawing from the world of cinema around him. His interests and studies from an early age weren’t in film, and had, in fact, studied and practiced law for years before his interests shifted to film in 1925. He worked as assistant director for Eisenstein, which would certainly account for his adept understanding of the technical aspects of film, but this certainly doesn’t explain his humanistic tone which is almost contrary to Eisenstein’s taste for icy and dramatic technicality. What’s not in doubt is Donskoy’s affection for Gorky, whom he knew, and whom he directed many films based both on Gorky’s life and work. Perhaps the fact that Dosnkoy was never a member of the communist party explains his ability to view the nationalism and social politics of his subjects with an eye that’s more compassionate and emotional, rather than abstract or theoretical.

Whatever the case may be, The Childhood of Maxim Gorky is an unusual forgotten masterpiece from a country whose cinema seems harder and harder to pin down the more I experience it. An analog to Renoir, Ford, Truffaut, and the neorealists is one of the last things I thought I’d find in a film from a country that’s most well-known from the technically brilliant cinematics of Eisenstein, Vertov, or Kalatozov, or the visual poetry of Tarkovsky or Dovzhenko. Much less would I expect to find it in a film about Maxim Gorky who largely founded the movement that would have such a profound effect on all Russian art.

Advertisements

About Jonathan Henderson
I'm a dedicated aesthete that's been fascinated with the arts since I was in my early teens. At 13 I saw my first foreign film, which ignited my passion for world cinema. I also discovered the enormous world of music out there and fell in love with everything from death metal to classical. My love for literature has especially grown in recent years, and I've taken up writing (and working really hard at) poetry. But over the past 12 years I've probably taken to film criticism more than anything, and seeing Neon Genesis Evangelion reignited my love for the arts (especially film) and took it to an even higher level. Now I write film reviews for two sites, including this one and Cinelogue. I play poker professionally, and while the world of arts and poker don't seem to converge much, I have taken the deductive and inductive logic that poker requires and attempted to apply it to all the arts as well as my criticism in an attempt to get past the jellybean syndrome ("I like blue jellybeans, you don't, and that's all we can say.").

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: